Which asset of computer-based career planning systems is often criticized?

The criticism surrounding the determination of user profitability in computer-based career planning systems often arises from the challenge of clearly measuring the financial benefits or return on investment that such systems provide. This aspect can be difficult to quantify, as the impact of career planning on an individual’s long-term career success and satisfaction may not translate directly into immediate financial metrics. Moreover, the complexities involved in establishing a direct correlation between the use of these systems and positive career outcomes can result in skepticism regarding their overall effectiveness and economic value.

In contrast, the other aspects such as instruction provision, administering assessments, and maintaining records are generally seen as more straightforward and beneficial components that directly support users in their career exploration and planning efforts. These features are typically designed to enhance the user experience, providing valuable insights and organizational support that facilitate informed decision-making in a career context.