If some planners of the evaluation are pleased with the results, but others are not, what is likely the issue?

When some planners of the evaluation are pleased with the results while others are not, it often reflects a divergence in opinions and expectations among the stakeholders involved. This situation underscores the concept that different stakeholders can have varied desired outcomes and success criteria for the evaluation.

Each group may have distinct priorities, goals, or perspectives on what the evaluation should achieve. For instance, one group might prioritize financial metrics, while another could focus on community impact or stakeholder engagement. Because these varied interests exist, it's plausible that the evaluation outcomes satisfy some stakeholders' criteria while failing to meet others'.

Understanding these differing expectations is crucial in the planning phase of evaluations. It highlights the importance of involving all relevant stakeholders in the discussion of goals and factors that will drive the evaluation's design and focus, ensuring that multiple perspectives are captured and addressed.

This answer aligns with acknowledging the complexity of evaluations, where success is subjective and depends on whose lens you are viewing it through.